Reposted From Quinnscommentary, see full article <here>
What do you say? How should we really fix Social Security?
So far we have gone from incoming payroll taxes paying the benefits, to incoming taxes and interest on bonds paying benefits. Next the Trust will be redeeming bonds plus using incoming taxes and interest on remaining bonds to pay benefits. And once the bonds are redeemed, the incoming taxes will only be sufficient to pay about 75% of the promised benefits.
One question keeps surfacing and that is does Social Security have anything to do with the federal deficit? Sen Bernie Sanders and others in Congress say no. Look at the link below referencing Ronald Regan taking that position as well. Here is what the article says:
Reagan said, “Social Security, let’s lay it to rest once and for all… Social security has nothing to do with the deficit. Social Security is totally funded by the payroll tax levied on employer and employee. If you reduce the outgo of Social Security, that money would not go into the general fund or reduce the deficit. It would go into the Social Security Trust Fund. So Social Security has nothing to do with balancing a budget or raising or lowering the deficit.”
Back in 1984 when Reagan said those words, it was accurate, payroll taxes paid all the benefits and there was money left over to buy additional Treasury bonds so it had nothing to do with the deficit. But today things are very different!
You can draw your own conclusion, but here are the facts. When incoming payroll taxes exceeded the benefits paid, the Trust purchased special bonds from the Treasury that paid interest. Where does the interest come from? The proceeds from the sale of the bonds was used by the government for all the stuff the government spends money on – just like your taxes. Now, when the Social Security Trust starts to redeem the bonds, the Treasury must come up with the money to transfer to the Trust to be used to pay benefits. The government currently spends about $3 billion more a day than it receives in revenue so it is a pretty good bet that it must borrow more money to pay the interest on the bonds and even more to redeem the bonds when called by the Social Security Trust. So, does the borrowing of more money add to the deficit? If not, where does it come from?
Here is what the motherjones.com link below says:
What actually happened is that the Social Security surplus was invested in treasury bonds. What does that mean? It means that workers gave money to the federal government, which turned around and spent it. In return, the Social Security trust fund received bonds that represented promises to repay the money later out of the federal government’s income tax receipts. In effect, it gave workers a claim on the income tax receipts of the government at a later date in time. When that time came, the federal government would have to pay up, which would make it less profitable. If the government was already running a deficit, it would make the deficit even worse.
Yes, the current status of Social Security funding does add to the deficit and to change that will take a cut in the benefit payments in some manner and/or an increase in payroll taxes … and that’s the truth.
